Glaciares de Chile
- Glaciares del Volcán Melimoyu
- Glaciares del Nevado de Queulat
- Glaciares del Volcán Mentolat
- Glaciares del Volcán Cay
- Glaciares del Volcán Macá
- Glaciares del Volcán Hudson
- Glaciar Erasmo
- Glaciar San Rafael
- Glaciar San Quintín
- Campo de Hielo Norte
- Glaciar Nef
- Glaciar Colonia
- Lago Cachet II
- Glaciar Steffen
- Glaciares del Monte San Lorenzo
- Glaciar Jorge Montt
- Glaciar Lucía
- Glaciar Los Moscos
- Glaciar Bernardo
- Glaciar O’Higgins
- Glaciar Chico
- Campo de Hielo Sur
- Campo de Hielo Sur
- Glaciar Témpanos
- Glaciar Pío XI
- Glaciar Viedma
- Glaciar Perito Moreno
- Glaciar Dickson
- Glaciar Olvidado
- Glaciar Grey
- Glaciar Amalia
- Glaciar Pingo
- Glaciar Tyndall
- Glaciar Balmaceda
- Isla Desolación
- Glaciares de la Isla Santa Inés
- Seno Gabriel
- Glaciar Schiaparelli
- Glaciar Marinelli
- Fiordo Parry
- Cordillera Darwin
- Glaciar Garibaldi
- Glaciar Roncagli
- Glaciares Isla Hoste
Antártica
“Surface ablation and its drivers along a west–east transect of the Southern Patagonia Icefield"
Bravo, C., A. Ross, D. Quincey, S. Cisternas and A. Rivera (2021): Journal of Glaciology, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2021.92
Resumen / Abstract.
Glaciers in the Southern Patagonia Icefield (SPI) have been shrinking in recent decades, but due
to a lack of field observations, understanding of the drivers of ablation is limited. We present a
distributed surface energy balance model, forced with meteorological observations from a west–
east transect located in the north of the SPI. Between October 2015 and June 2016, humid and
warm on-glacier conditions prevailed on the western side compared to dry and cold conditions
on the eastern side. Controls of ablation differ along the transect, although at glacier-wide scale
sensible heat (mean of 72Wm-² to the west and 51Wm-² to the east) and net shortwave radiation
(mean of 54Wm-² to the west and 52Wm-² to the east) provided the main energy
sources. Net longwave radiation was an energy sink, while latent heat was the most spatially variable
flux, being an energy sink in the east (−4Wm-²) and a source in the west (20Wm-²).
Ablation was high, but at comparable elevations, it was greater to the west. These results provide
new insights into the spatial variability of energy-balance fluxes and their control over the ablation
of Patagonian glaciers.