Glaciares de Chile
- Glaciares del Volcán Melimoyu
- Glaciares del Nevado de Queulat
- Glaciares del Volcán Mentolat
- Glaciares del Volcán Cay
- Glaciares del Volcán Macá
- Glaciares del Volcán Hudson
- Glaciar Erasmo
- Glaciar San Rafael
- Glaciar San Quintín
- Campo de Hielo Norte
- Glaciar Nef
- Glaciar Colonia
- Lago Cachet II
- Glaciar Steffen
- Glaciares del Monte San Lorenzo
- Glaciar Jorge Montt
- Glaciar Lucía
- Glaciar Los Moscos
- Glaciar Bernardo
- Glaciar O’Higgins
- Glaciar Chico
- Campo de Hielo Sur
- Campo de Hielo Sur
- Glaciar Témpanos
- Glaciar Pío XI
- Glaciar Viedma
- Glaciar Perito Moreno
- Glaciar Dickson
- Glaciar Olvidado
- Glaciar Grey
- Glaciar Amalia
- Glaciar Pingo
- Glaciar Tyndall
- Glaciar Balmaceda
- Isla Desolación
- Glaciares de la Isla Santa Inés
- Seno Gabriel
- Glaciar Schiaparelli
- Glaciar Marinelli
- Fiordo Parry
- Cordillera Darwin
- Glaciar Garibaldi
- Glaciar Roncagli
- Glaciares Isla Hoste
Antártica
“Reply to the comments by Kochtitzky and Edwards (2020) on the study ‘Area changes of glaciers on active volcanoes in Latin America’ by Reinthaler and others (2019)”
Reinthaler J, F. Paul, H. Delgado H. Granados, A. Rivera and C. Huggel (2020): Journal of Glaciology 66(259), 887–888. doi.org/10.1017/jog.2020.72
Resumen / Abstract.
This is a reply to the comments by Kochtizky and Edwards (2020) on our study “area changes of glaciers on active volcanoes in latin America” who described an overestimation of glacier area and retreat rates for the Nevado Coropuna Ice Cap and Nevado del Huila in our study, most likely due to the inclusion of seasonal snow in our glacier maps. In general we fully agree that only the best datasets available should be used for glacier mapping, as glacier outlines and changes are widely used. Although area change rates themselves have limited prognostic power, their trends for a specific mountain range and across regions provide valuable information about climate change impacts and should thus be derived as accurately as possible.